Monday, January 30, 2006

Prepared To Walk Away

Nitin is not sure whether India's decision to abstain at IAEA on Iran is strategic or childish.

This follows US Ambassador David Mulford's threat to India which we argued is background noise -- what India needed to focus, instead, was hard bargaining. Well, we are getting some of this now.

It goes without saying that India's bargaining position is enormously weakened if it were not prepared to walk from the US nuclear deal. We think India's Iran abstention communicates its willingness to do precisely that to US interlocutors. Seen together with the weekend sidelining of anti-US Mani Shankar Aiyar and retention of the foreign ministry by the pro-US Dr. Singh, the message cannot be clearer: India is willing to cut a deal with America, but only at sensible terms -- otherwise we walk.

Iran itself is a useful sideshow to this Indo-US fencing.

This is entirely appropriate. Not only does this action silence domestic critics of the deal, it makes India more credible at the bargaining table with the US.

Ultimately, US must understand that it needs India perhaps even more than India needs it. India has prospered independent of US patronage so far, and will continue to do so with or without a deal with Americans. America, on the other hand, cannot really play in Asia absent partnership with the ever-stronger India.

India calling America's bluff is entirely within the rules of poker. Hopefully, this will eventually yield a better deal for India and a worthy ally for America.

1 comment:

libertarian said...

PR: CN's detailed coverage of the deal itself (absent the Iran murkiness) certainly gives pause. We should certainly be prepared to walk away unless the deal is a good one. Your point of the US needing India more than India needs the US is well taken. The US has a limited window where it will enjoy it's current dominant position.

Followers

Blog Archive