Opinion Journal columnist Mary Anastasia O'Grady writes that democracy does not always create prosperity.
She contrasts Estonia with Chile as an example, then observes:
Countries that liberalize quickly and thoroughly achieve resounding successes, politically and economically. Conversely, gradualism risks stagnation and even reversals, because the benefits are not evident enough to impress the electorate and generate a momentum in their favor.
Hopefully, someone will share a cutting with India's regrettably gradualist leaders.
Wednesday, January 04, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(194)
-
▼
January
(62)
- US-India Nuclear Deal
- Prepared To Walk Away
- Familiarity & Contempt
- Politics And Math
- Greetings on Republic Day
- Background Noise
- Baltistan
- Greetings, Mr. Aziz
- Indian History being rewritten in the US
- Madrassa Reform
- Pakhtunkhwa
- Mind bending experiment in China
- Cricket And Terror
- The Market Knows?
- Idiocy Watch
- Self-Destructive Rage
- Memory
- Indian Foreign Policy: Reflections
- The Valley Of Blood
- Nuclear Knee
- Shapely Observation
- Education
- Startling Escalation
- Jain Ire At ASI
- Idiocy Watch
- Negotiating with Musharraf. Not.
- Ignorance Is Bliss
- Lebanon Adrift?
- The Al-Aqsa Constraint
- Sex and Nudity
- Unintelligent Design?
- Arsenic Laced Honey
- Outrage In Malaysia
- Matters Of Morality
- Good News, Maybe
- Hopping Humans
- Sue The Saudis
- Green Is Not All Good
- Malthus Lives!
- Japan and the Modern Novel
- Is Musharraf Toast?
- Is Musharraf delusionary?
- Dragon In The Lab
- A Democracy Of Dunces
- Supreme Court
- Ghadr Movement
- Delhi Chills
- Break Up Our Broken Polity
- Start With The Man In The Mirror
- Extending Democracy To All Indians
- Blog Mela
- India's Scheduled Tribes
- Does India Have A Security Strategy?
- Deep Sorrow
- Idiocy Watch
- India - Center of the Muslim World?
- Cruel Irony
- Quotas
- Fawning Over Terrorists
- On Economic Liberty
- Dark Clouds
- Back In The Race
-
▼
January
(62)
1 comment:
The Chilean arguement is old and foolish. The only reason why Chile managed a successful transition was that they had a strong social safety net. While at one level they privatized pensions for the salaried classes (creating a huge amount of investment funds) they also spent more on handouts to the lower income groups.
Is it a coincidence that since Pinochet was toppled Chile has been lurching leftwards.
Post a Comment