Amit links to a New York Times interview with V S Naipaul where the maestro makes a series of typically astonishing assertions.
Is it just us or is Mr. Naipaul's inking of other people's voices (e.g., in Among the Believers) far more intelligent, and intelligible, than his own spoken words?
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(581)
-
▼
August
(50)
- New Orleans
- Blog Interrupted
- Mahmoud And Manmohan
- Blinded By Revolution
- Homeopathy
- Saeed Naqvi
- Rummy Is Toast
- Chasing China
- Our Friends, The Pakistanis
- A Thin-Skinned Court
- Principles of Modern Autocracy
- Shariat
- Dr. Singh And Naxals
- Gaza
- India And Stem Cell Research
- Et Tu, Rezwan?
- Violins In Kalimpong
- Rural Wi-Fi
- The Nature Of Defeatism
- Bangladesh Bombings
- Charitable Deductions
- The Indian Economy
- The Greatest Trick
- August 15
- G4's Quest Is Over
- An Ominous Report
- The Theology Of Global Warming
- The Nature Of War
- Drugs In Sports
- Like PLO With Arafat
- Revolutions From Tea Parties
- My Son, The Fanatic
- Evolution, Again
- Power Or Poison?
- The Writer's Spoken Words
- Evolution -- with a small e
- Mumbai
- 1984
- Mohun Biswas, 007
- Pakistan
- Journeys Without Destination
- Hiroshima
- London On Our Mind
- The Flu Pandemic
- The Sexed Up Uber-Equation
- Evil Echo
- Snort Me A River
- A Welcome Murmur
- Mercy
- A Real Dark Day In Iraq
-
▼
August
(50)
No comments:
Post a Comment