Natan Sharansky argues that only with democracy can the middle east be pacified. The status-quo approach of coddling dictators is deeply flawed.
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article.asp?aid=11804074_1
This idea is correct. Given the absence of real democracy all around India, it is worth pondering if it shouldn't be India's objective as well to persuade and, if necessary force, our neighbors into political modernity.
Atal ji once said that nations cannot choose neighbors -- this was his rationale for "peace" with the Pakistani establishment. Could he have been more wrong? Why should strong nations have to accept their environment as a given? This is a reactive worldview.
Instead, strong nations should pro-actively enforce their democratic political standards on their neighbors. This is the only path to lasting peace.
Friday, November 19, 2004
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(54)
-
▼
November
(36)
- United Nations
- Brazil's Bomb -- with Indian help?
- Pakistan's Hamid Gul
- Bharateeya Blog Mela
- Patriot Missiles
- Pogrom in Gujarat
- Kashmir
- Global Commerce
- United Nations
- Environment
- Culture
- United Nations
- China
- Hip Hinglish
- India Terror Warning
- Pogrom in Gujarat
- Neo-conservatism
- The Shia Bomb
- United Nations
- Energy and Environment
- Custodians of Culture
- Murder in Kanchi
- Kashmir
- Murder in Kanchi
- Corruption
- China
- Democracy
- Corruption
- Head and Heart
- The Bush Revolution
- United Nations
- United Nations
- Indo-US relationship
- Neo-conservatism
- Kashmir
- Whose blog is this?
-
▼
November
(36)
No comments:
Post a Comment