In National Review Online, influential American historian Victor David Hanson writes about the emergence of Asia (& the regression of Europe).
Choice quote:
But the real question is how both China and India, nuclear and arming, will translate their newfound economic clout and cash into a geopolitical role. If internal politics and protocols are any barometer of foreign policy, it should be an interesting show. We mostly welcome the new India — nuclear, law-abiding, and English-speaking — onto the world stage. It deserves a permanent seat on the Security Council and a close alliance with the United States.
China, however, is a very different story — a soon-to-be grasping Soviet Union-like superpower without any pretense of Marxist egalitarianism. Despite massive cash reserves and ongoing trade surpluses, it violates almost every international commercial protocol from copyright law to patents. It won’t discuss Tibet, and it uses staged domestic unrest to send warnings to Taiwan and Japan that their regional options will increasingly be limited by Beijing.
Is it just us, or are we suddenly seeing a proliferation of pro-India (& China-wary) rhetoric from right-leaning American intellectuals, policy makers, & journalists? Is this somehow orchestrated as prelude to the up-coming US visit of Manmohan Singh? Not that we are complaining!!
Friday, June 10, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(581)
-
▼
June
(59)
- Water Trouble
- Secular Shouldn't Have To Mean Stupid
- World Bank Stupidity Watch
- Predicting Traffic
- Courts Shouldn't Legislate
- Clinton Global Initiative
- Madrassah Reform
- No god But God
- What If America Fails In Iraq?
- The Coming Confrontation
- We Don't Need No Education
- No Autonomy For Kashmir -- Redux
- Debating Via Blogs
- Tale Of Two Species
- Politics Is Genetic
- Curing HIV
- Merit Matters
- Mandela 'N The Hood
- Han!
- Opposing Autonomy For Kashmir
- Dual Citizenship Implies Dual Loyalty
- Bangladesh Planning To Kill Indian Woman
- Freedom To Smoke
- The Plot Against The World
- On History
- China
- Optimistic India
- Invite Mukhtaran Mai To The White House
- Baby-Faced Politicians, Beware!
- The Peace Mountain?
- Security For Women
- The Next Controversy
- Sound Strategy -- Update
- A Shameful Display
- Intimidation Is Not Investigation
- Global Warming
- Sound Strategy
- The Global Shake-Up
- Kyunki ORS Is A Good Thing
- One Can't Make This Up
- Condoleezza Rice
- The Advani Triangulation
- Five Year Old Policeman
- My Reach Exceeds His Grasp
- Another Saudi Outrage
- Another Munchian Moment
- Do Maps Have Morals?
- Portrait Of A Monster
- Blond Ambition
- Ten Most Harmful Books, And Seven Great Movies
- It's Hard To Be Easy!
- Security Council Expansion and China
- The Nectar of Life
- 242 Hindus
- A European Lesson For Liberal India
- China's Peaceful Rise?
- Khan Artist
- Jaswant Singh At Brookings
- Why Museums Matter
-
▼
June
(59)
2 comments:
We think the US now sees China as a clear threat; China's recent belligerence in East Asia (esp. against US-ally Japan) has solidified this perspective.
On India, US likely does not know how the game will play out. But, many here (esp. the neo-conservatives) have long been interested in using India to balance China, and as a foil to the extremism emerging in the middle east.
So, US will court India heavily, but keep its expectations low; in the minimum, this'll keep Indians happy (we love American approval, after all), and will irritate China no end (because it doesn't see India in its league).
India should leverage this serendipitous circumstance to aggresively push our global interests (which, at the moment, do largely coincide with America's).
Best regards.
I think that India will play the way americans want.
After all, we have served loyally Anglo-Saxons before
Post a Comment